Ya know, I enjoy doing little effects and stuff. It’s fun and interesting and there are like a hundred ways to do the exact same thing. Take care everyone! ^_^
Yosh! Saga
Ya know, I enjoy doing little effects and stuff. It’s fun and interesting and there are like a hundred ways to do the exact same thing. Take care everyone! ^_^
Oh ho? And what does Kate have up her proverbial sleeve.
Her brains and her indestructible pawn. Kate’s got all the tools she needs and then some.
Love the firefight in the 3rd panel. Curious if that book Phil is still carrying around, might play a role in this fight?
DAT Aaaaahaha, nevermind that’s Phil…
Oh dear.
Throw the null, guys! That’s always plan A!
finaly some one who agread with what in have been trying to to get through to you people for the past few pages
I like the new Design and Layout of the comments section. The previous one got… messy.
“hey hun,” lol i just imagined a calmed and a relaxed voice sayin that while theres fire and water,fight stuff in the background
In the Rainbow Factory, where your fears and horrors come true
In the Rainbow Factory, where not a single soul gets through
“You can see but identify illusions” doesn’t sound right. Was that intentional?
Sage MOD • 8 hours ago • parent
I kinda have to disagree but If it’s really that bad I’ll ask around and get a consensus on it. The reason for the wording is because, being the null, some people think that he cannot see illusions because they wouldn’t affect him. If he CAN see them though wouldn’t that mean that he is somehow affected by them? This says that while he can see them, he somehow knows they are not real. Thus “See but identify” takes that into account and to me seems to be how Kate would be asking because it is a more involved question.
Copypasted from above.
‘can see but identify illusions’ Isn’t the best choice of words, I fear. Maybe ‘and’ instead? It’s a bit confusing…
I kinda have to disagree but If it’s really that bad I’ll ask around and get a consensus on it. The reason for the wording is because, being the null, some people think that he cannot see illusions because they wouldn’t affect him. If he CAN see them though wouldn’t that mean that he is somehow affected by them? This says that while he can see them, he somehow knows they are not real. Thus “See but identify” takes that into account and to me seems to be how Kate would be asking because it is a more involved question.
I think the statement was just fine, I understood what Kate meant right away.
I now understand. Sorry to cause you trouble and thanks for the feedback. Perhaps I should read your comic at another time other than 01:30 >.<"
I sort of got what she was asking, but the grammar felt unclear and I wound up looking down here to see if it was just me. I thought you accidentally left a word out after “but” or “can” was suppose to be “can’t”. “But also” would probably help, or changing “but” to “and” since they imply he can see what the illusion is showing and know that it is an illusion.
that last part about of kate’s line the “but” should be an “and” and that is kind of a dumb question to ask to some one who has the atenton span of a 5 year old(some times)